Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(type): improve the Fields derive macro #14934

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wangrunji0408
Copy link
Contributor

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 commented Feb 1, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR adds primary_key and into_owned_row support to the Fields trait and derive macro.
This is a preparation for refactoring system catalogs #13433.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 changed the title feat: improve the Fields derive macro feat(type): improve the Fields derive macro Feb 1, 2024
Signed-off-by: Runji Wang <[email protected]>
@TennyZhuang TennyZhuang requested a review from BugenZhao February 1, 2024 14:22
Copy link
Member

@BugenZhao BugenZhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM

@@ -570,10 +570,17 @@ pub trait ToOwnedDatum {
fn to_owned_datum(self) -> Datum;
}

impl ToOwnedDatum for DatumRef<'_> {
impl<T: Into<ScalarImpl>> ToOwnedDatum for T {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBH I'd prefer introducing a new trait for doing such conversion. By ToOwnedDatum I suppose it's only for the conversion from the ref type to an owned type, just like the std's ToOwned trait with GAT support.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But logically types impl Into<ScalarImpl> can be converted ToOwnedDatum. I think it would be convenient to reuse this trait.

src/common/src/types/fields.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@TennyZhuang TennyZhuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 36edf71 Feb 5, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 deleted the wrj/derive-fields branch February 5, 2024 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants